Cuts for circular proofs

نویسندگان

  • Jérôme Fortier
  • Luigi Santocanale
چکیده

One of the authors introduced in [2] a calculus of circular proofs for studying the computability arising from the following categorical operations: finite products and coproducts, initial algebras, final coalgebras. The calculus of [2] is cut-free; yet, even if sound and complete for provability, it lacks an important property for the semantics of proofs, namely fullness w.r.t. the class of natural categorical models called μ-bicomplete category in [3]. We fix, with this work, this problem by adding the cut rule to the calculus. To this goal, we need to modify the syntactical constraints on the cycles of proofs so to ensure soundness of the calculus and at same time local termination of cut-elimination. The enhanced proof system fully represents arrows of the intended model, a free μ-bicomplete category. We also describe a cut-elimination procedure as a model of computation arising from the above mentioned categorical operations. The procedure constructs a cut-free proof-tree with infinite branches out of a finite circular proof with cuts.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cuts for circular proofs: semantics and cut-elimination

One of the authors introduced in [16] a calculus of circular proofs for studying the computability arising from the following categorical operations: finite products, finite coproducts, initial algebras, final coalgebras. The calculus presented [16] is cut-free; even if sound and complete for provability, it lacked an important property for the semantics of proofs, namely fullness w.r.t. the cl...

متن کامل

Substructural Proofs as Automata

We present subsingleton logic as a very small fragment of linear logic containing only , 1, least fixed points and allowing circular proofs. We show that cut-free proofs in this logic are in a Curry– Howard correspondence with subsequential finite state transducers. Constructions on finite state automata and transducers such as composition, complement, and inverse homomorphism can then be reali...

متن کامل

Circular (Yet Sound) Proofs

We introduce a new way of composing proofs in rule-based proof systems that generalizes tree-like and dag-like proofs. In the new definition, proofs are directed graphs of derived formulas, in which cycles are allowed as long as every formula is derived at least as many times as it is required as a premise. We call such proofs circular. We show that, for all sets of standard inference rules, ci...

متن کامل

Proof Transformation by CERES

Cut-elimination is the most prominent form of proof transformation in logic. The elimination of cuts in formal proofs corresponds to the removal of intermediate statements (lemmas) in mathematical proofs. The cut-elimination method CERES (cut-elimination by resolution) works by constructing a set of clauses from a proof with cuts. Any resolution refutation of this set then serves as a skeleton ...

متن کامل

Elementary Elimination of Prenex Cuts in Disjunction-free Intuitionistic Logic

The size of shortest cut-free proofs of first-order formulas in intuitionistic sequent calculus is known to be non-elementary in the worst case in terms of the size of given sequent proofs with cuts of the same formulas. In contrast to that fact, we provide an elementary bound for the size of cut-free proofs for disjunction-free intuitionistic logic for the case where the cut-formulas of the or...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013